The final unit for this semester in ECI 517 focused on two
theories, case based learning and cognitive flexibility theory. Along with readings on these two topics, we
were introduced to the idea of learning objects.
Case Based Learning
Case Based Learning Methods (CBL) is an umbrella under which
ideas like problem based learning, goal based scenarios and anchored instruction
can all fall. The ideas shared by these
theories are that learning should involve storytelling, and context centered
instruction is superior to more traditional teaching methods.
Case-Based Reasoning Model (CBR) on the other hand is an
improvement upon CBL methods that offer the learner a limited viewpoint. CBR challenges learners to look at how
learning can be recycled and improved upon in order to solve future problems of
a similar but not exact nature. This is
accomplish by citing multiple cases instead of the narrower viewpoint offered
by most CBL methods.
CBR also provides a concrete model with which to work like
that of the Star Legacy Model from last unit.
In the case of CBR the steps are, the 4 RE's: Retrieve, Reuse, Revise, and Retain.
Cognitive Flexibility Theory
Cognitive Flexibility Theory (CFT) is a theory that seeks to
provide learners with multiple viewpoints on a given topic and in doing so
allows the learner to use their experiences plus the conflicting perspectives
presented to develop their own opinions on a given topic. Learning in Cognitive Flexibility Theory is
ill structured meaning that not only will students get diverse viewpoints in a
domain, they will also not get the entire story from just one source. In fact one of the key points is to have
students construct their own knowledge from partial sources.
Comparing and Contrasting the Theories
CBR and CFT have a great deal in common. CBR and CFT both place emphasis on
storytelling. In CBR stories are the
primary mode of instruction, learners use prior cases and seek to use the lessons
learned to solve future problems. CFT on
the other hand, treats the learner to tidbits of information which they use to
create their own stories to explain the situations presented to them.
Next, both CBR and CFT place a great deal of emphasis on
learning in context. The difference here
being that CBR methods place an emphasis on solving problems. On the other hand, CFT can sometimes lead to
the solution of a problem. However, CFT can
just as easily teach learners to find answers to tough philosophical questions. This is accomplished by having learners look
at a situation from multiple perspectives and even from different areas of
expertise.
Also of note is that both of these theories are
constructivist in nature. The Cognitive
Flexibility Theory strikes me as the most constructivist while CBR models can
be more or less based on the number of cases presented to the learner. CFT on the other hand seems to demand a huge
amount of resources and viewpoints to remain true to the theory.
Impressions of Case-Based Reasoning
Case Based Learning is a great way to teach students and I
would love to include more case based learning in my classes. Science is the place where this stands out to
me. I think teaching students scientific
inquiry through case study in conjunction with experimentation would be an
excellent way to model how scientists build upon the prior discoveries of other
scientists.
The major problem I see with the CBR method is planning and
organizing lessons. There are a number
of tools that can help with this. The
most obvious are online case study databases.
Also of note are bookmarking tools like Diigo which will help organize
cases by tagging. Finally, course management
systems, like Moodle, would be extremely useful in organizing units.
Impressions of Cognitive Flexibility Theory
I am very impressed by Cognitive Flexibility Theory
primarily due to the Plantation Letters project. I would love to involve this type of learning
in my social studies classes. I found
the puzzle created by the letters intriguing and I think similar projects would
appeal to many of my middle school students.
I do think the number of reading would have to be adjusted to maintain
their attention though. I also wish more
examples of theories such as this were designed with middle grades curriculum
in mind, but with the upcoming change to common core curriculum maybe this will
happen since social studies will have more of a historical slant.
CFT suffers from the same problem as CBR in that these
lessons seem to require a broad scope to create. CFT truly needs a team of planners to
orchestrate an effective lesson because it thrives on diversity of
viewpoints. A way to tag and organize
documents is key when planning a CFT lesson, suggestion for this include tools
like Diigo or developing a database. I
would also try to use community building tools and seek to form a panel of
experts to help create lessons. Another
key component is a blogging tool to provide students with an outlet for
reflection. Blogging tools are plentiful
and choices include Edublogs, Wordpress, or Blogger among others.
A Word about Learning Objects
Learning Objects an exciting idea in the world of
instructional technology. Learning Objects
are resources that are created in a generic sense so that they are usable for a
wide variety of learning theories. A
learning object seeks to reduce learning objectives to its essential building
blocks. This would allow these blocks to
be reused any number of times and in any number of lessons. These objects would use metadata tags in such
a way to make them searchable in a catalog of resources.
I am already using a version of learning objects in my
classroom. Discovery Education has
sought to gather a database of articles, video clips and images. These resources can be broken down in a
number of ways and included in any number of lessons. Discovery isn't the ultimate realization of learning
objects but it is a step in this direction.
Conclusions
Case Based Learning Method and Cognitive Flexibility Theory
are grand attempts to teach students complex ideas through the use of
stories. These methods require a huge
amount of planning and resources to pull off successfully but with today's
advances in the area of instructional technology and the development of
learning objects, these constructivist theories are easier to design and
implement than ever before.
Charles,
ReplyDeleteI really liked the headings you included in your blog. It made it easy to know what the purpose of each section was about. You did a great job ensuring the information from the readings for this unit were clear and succinct. Like you, I found it easier to compare and contrast CBL and CFT. Also, there were clearly models that we have learned previously integrated into each of these. With the plantation letter assignment, you seemed to be inspired to implement something similar within your own classroom. It would be great to design a similar activity for my students as well. I believe this would encourage them to think about connecting their knowledge opposed to learning in isolation. Great blog! I really enjoyed reading your thoughts and learnings you had during this unit.
- Kylie
Charles, that is wonderful that you want to include Cognitive Flex Theory in your classroom. I admire you wanting to try it with 7th graders. It is good to start higher level thinking early! ~Anna B.
ReplyDeleteI like that you relate Case Based Learning to Science. This is the area that makes the most sense to me as well. I'd love to see it implemented in a social studies or language arts class as well. I have a hard time coming up with an idea for my math classes, but I'm sure with enough planning it could be done. I think that it is great that you use Discovery Education in your classroom. I also think you make a great point about the amount of time and effort that would need to go into planning Case-Based and Cog-Flex activities. I think that the time would be well worth it if you could split it with your PLT and reuse it each year.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFor the Case Based learning in science - an excellent field to incorporate this in. In our area, there are programs during the summer for science for the science teachers to do a ride along with different companies in the area to "see" the science in action. The simple banter between teacher and scientist into what they are covering and creating forms a wonderful, long term story dialogue to share and hopefully, invigorate the attention and livelihood of the students.
ReplyDeleteDiscovery Ed is a great resource. Well done on finding and already incorporating it into your teaching.
I love hearing the application of ideas/theories in other's teaching. I am greatly encouraged from reading your post. Thank you.
Keith Murphy
Great summary of the unit, Charlie. It's also great to hear you're already using Learning Objects in your classroom. I agree with you that these appropaches are difficult to design and create (especially on one's own), but with development of technology and the raising of the level of comfort with technology of upcoming generations of teachers and students, perhaps it will get easier to create quality resources following these theories.
ReplyDeleteBiljana